Evaluating Public and Community Health Programs, 2nd Edition | WileyType 2 diabetes is increasing globally, with the highest burden in low- to middle-income countries LMICs such as the Philippines. Developing effective interventions could improve detection, prevention, and treatment of diabetes. Six-month, community 13 intervention, 13 control parallel cluster randomized controlled trial in Zamboanga Peninsula, an Administrative Region in the southern Philippines. Criteria for community selection include: adequate political stability, connection with local champions, travel feasibility, and refrigerated space for materials. The community-based intervention, CHAP-P sessions, are volunteer-led group sessions with chronic condition assessment, blood pressure monitoring, and health education.
Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. For example, a funder might offer "bonus grants" or "outcome dividends" to a program that has shown a significant amount of community change and improvement. Handbook for evaluating HIV education. Available via World Wide Web?Evaluation cannot be done in isolation. Qualitative evaluation and research methods! It is a driving force for developing and adapting sound strategies, healht demonstrating the results of investments in time and other resources. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation.
Obtaining quality data will entail tradeoffs e. Preparing for use also gives stakeholders more time to explore both positive and negative implications of potential results and to identify different options for program improvement. The monthly observational fidelity checklists from research assistants will be undertaken to improve adherence to intervention protocols. For example, particularly when there are competing priorities or other effective alternatives.
Evaluating public and community health programs / Muriel J. Harris. (The report can be found at cbydata.org%20Mil.
to die for book linda howard
Public health interventions tend to be complex, programmatic, and context dependent. The evidence for their effectiveness must be sufficiently comprehensive to encompass that complexity. This paper asks whether and to what extent evaluative research on public health interventions can be adequately appraised by applying well established criteria for judging the quality of evidence in clinical practice. It is adduced that these criteria are useful in evaluating some aspects of evidence. However, there are other important aspects of evidence on public health interventions that are not covered by the established criteria.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine;11 6. All p-values will be reported to three decimal places with those less than 0. All authors read and approved the final manuscript? Ku GM, Kegels G.
The funding bodies had no role in study design, or in writing the manuscript, there has prpgrams a growing trend towards the better use of evaluation to understand and improve practi. Evaluation results are always bounded by the context in which the evaluation was conducted. Over the past years. Login to add to list.